Home  ›  The Art of Voice Language Art of the Rhetoric

The Art of Voice Language Art of the Rhetoric

Written By Monday, April 25, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Communication through visual elements

Visual rhetoric is the art of constructive communication through visual elements such as images, typography, and texts. Visual rhetoric encompasses the skill of visual literacy and the ability to clarify images for their form and meaning.[1] Cartoon on techniques from semiotics and rhetorical analysis, visual rhetoric expands on visual literacy as it examines the construction of an epitome with the focus on its persuasive effects on an audience.[1]

Although visual rhetoric also involves typography and other texts, it concentrates mainly on the employ of images or visual texts. Using images is central to visual rhetoric considering these visuals help in either forming the example an paradigm lone wants to convey, or arguing the betoken that a author formulates, in the instance of a multimodal text which combines image and written text, for example. Visual rhetoric has gained more notoriety equally more recent scholarly work started exploring culling media forms that include graphics, screen design, and other hybrid visual representations that does not privilege print civilisation and conventions.[ii] Also, visual rhetoric involves how writers arrange segments of a visual text on the folio. In addition to that, visual rhetoric involves the selection of different fonts, contrastive colors, and graphs, among other elements, to shape a visual rhetoric text. Ane vital component of visual rhetoric is analyzing the visual text.[iii] The interactional and commonly hybrid nature of cyber spaces that usually mixes print text and visual images unable some detachment of them as isolated constructs, and scholarship has claimed that peculiarly in virtual spaces where print text and visuals are usually combined, there is no place either for emphasizing i way over another.[iv] One way of analyzing a visual text is to look for its significant meaning.

Simply put, the pregnant should be deeper than the literal sense that a visual text holds. One manner to clarify a visual text is to dissect it in club for the viewer to empathise its tenor. Viewers can break the text into smaller parts and share perspectives to attain its meaning.[5] In analyzing a text that includes an image of the bold eagle, equally the master body of the visual text, questions of representation and connotation come into play. Analyzing a text that includes a photo, painting, or even cartoon of the assuming eagle along with written words, would bring to mind the conceptions of force and freedom, rather than the conception of only a bird.

This includes an understanding of the creative and rhetorical choices made with coloring, shaping, and object placement.[6] The power of imagery, iconic photographs, for instance, can potentially generate deportment in a global scale.[7] Rhetorical choices behave great significance that surpass reinforcement of the written text.  Each choice, be font, color, layout, represents a unlike message that writer wants to portray for the audience.[8] Visual rhetoric emphasizes images every bit sensory expressions of cultural and contextual pregnant, as opposed to purely aesthetic consideration.[ix] Analyzing visuals and their ability to convey messages is central to incorporating visual rhetoric inside the digital era equally nuances of choices regarding audition, purpose and genre can be analyzed within a unmarried frame and the rationale behind designers' rhetorical choices tin be revealed and analyzed by how the elements of visuals play out birthday. Visual rhetoric has been approached and applied in a variety of academic fields including art history, linguistics, semiotics, cultural studies, concern and technical advice, speech communication, and classical rhetoric. Visual rhetoric seeks to develop rhetorical theory in a way that is more comprehensive and inclusive with regard to images and their interpretations.[10]

History and origin [edit]

The term Rhetoric originated in ancient Hellenic republic and its concept has been widely discussed for thousands of years. Sophists starting time coined the idea equally an abstract term to help label the concept, while Aristotle more narrowly divers rhetoric as a message's potential to influence audiences.[11] Linguists and other researchers often ascertain rhetoric through the well-known five canons of rhetoric. Over time, this definition has evolved, expanded, and raised serious debate as new digital mediums of communicating have developed.

In his volume Elements of Criticism, rhetorician Lord Kames (also known as Henry Home) laid the groundwork for subsequently rhetoricians by taking the controversial opinion of including visual art in his theory of criticism. Kames argued many of the same points as other Enlightenment scholars—mainly that fine art was beneficial to the public—and worthy of notation and praise—if it was encouraging a moral improvement of its audience.[12]

French theorist Roland Barthes in 1977 brought to light a new way to evaluate other communication ways, showing the relevance of traditional rhetorical theories to the nevertheless photographic medium.[13] Barthes explained visual rhetoric mostly as the implied and interpreted messages from the piece of work, all the same these bigger messages oftentimes extend across the initial superficial interpretation.[13] Visual rhetoric uses a multifariousness of tools to hook readers within its mediums (e.g. gifs).[fourteen] Although similar in nature, one striking difference between visual and classical rhetoric is the newfound outlook on Aristotle's original cannons. Linda Scott created a newfound audience by constructing new cannons exclusive to visual rhetoric.[xiv] Instead of closely monitoring the content, as with the initial 5 cannons, Scott's focused on the visual medium's ability to invent and argument, arrangement of the particular, and all coupled with a meaningful delivery of presentation. Since its inception, popular studies take appeared in published works to discuss the office of visual rhetoric in many facets of human life, especially advertising.

The term emerged largely as an effort to set bated a certain area of report that would focus attention on specific rhetorical elements of visual mediums.[15] Historically, the study of rhetoric has been geared toward linguistics.[10] Visual symbols were deemed trivial and subservient and thus, were largely ignored as office of a rhetorical statement. Every bit a result, modern rhetorical theory developed with a meaning exclusion of these visual symbols, ignoring the field of visual rhetoric equally a separate area of study.[10] Scholars of visual rhetoric analyze photographs, drawings, paintings, graphs and tables, interior design and compages, sculpture, Net images, and picture.[x] From a rhetorical perspective, the focus is on the contextual response rather than the aesthetic response.[ten] An aesthetic response is a viewer's direct perception with the sensory aspects of the visual, whereas with a rhetorical response, pregnant is given to the visual.[10] Every part of the artifact has significance in the message beingness conveyed; each line, each shading, each person has a purpose.[x] As visual rhetoricians study images and symbols, their findings catalyze challenges to the linguistic significant birthday, assuasive a more than holistic study of the rhetorical argument to emerge with the introduction of visual elements.

[edit]

Composition [edit]

The field of composition studies has recently returned its attention to visual rhetoric. In an increasingly visual society, proponents of visual rhetoric in composition classes propose that increased literacy requires writing and visual communication skills. In relation to visual rhetoric, the composition field positions itself, more broadly, into challenging reductive definitions of composing and rhetoric that gravitate toward verbal communication simply. Touching upon rhetorical processes/decisions that touch on a visual pattern is a venue for calling composition scholars' attention of the function that arrangements of images and words play out in writing practices and thus communication, emphasizing the complex relationship between verbal and visual meanings.[2] [four] [viii] Visual advice skills relate to an understanding of the mediated nature of all communication, particularly to an awareness of the human action of representation.[16] [17] Visual rhetoric can exist utilized in a composition classroom to assist with writing and rhetoric development.

A stop sign is an case of semiotics in everyday life. Drivers sympathize that the sign means they must stop. Stop signs be in a larger context of road signs, all with unlike meanings, designed for traffic safety.

Traffic Light

A traffic light is some other example of everyday semiotics that we use on a daily basis, specially on the road. It is a fix of automatically operated colored lights, typically red, xanthous, and green, for controlling traffic at road junctions and crosswalks. Those who drive understand the significant of each color without the usage of written words.

Semiotics [edit]

Semiotic theory is defined as a theory that seeks to describe the rhetorical significance of sign-making. The fundamental idea of the theory is that a sign does not exist outside of a contextual experience, but it just exists in relation to other signs, objects, and entities. Therefore, the sign belongs to a larger system, and when taken out of context of other signs, is rendered meaningless and uncommunicable. The parts of a semiotic are divided into ii parts: the cloth part of the sign is known as the form of expression, the meaning of the form of expression is known as class of content.[xviii] In semiotic theory, the expression just has meaningful content when existing in a larger contextual framework.

Areas of focus [edit]

While studying visual objects, rhetorical scholars tend to have three areas of report: nature, function, or evaluation.[10] Nature encompasses the literal components of the artifact.[x] This is a principal focus of visual rhetoric because in order to empathise the office of an image, it is necessary to understand the substantive and stylistic nature of the antiquity itself.[x] Function holds a somewhat literal definition—information technology represents the purpose an image serves for an audience.[ten] The part, or purpose, of an image may be to evoke a certain emotion.[x] The evaluation of an artifact determines if the image serves its role.

Rhetorical application [edit]

Visual rhetoric studies how humans employ images to communicate. Elements of images, such every bit size color, line, and shape, are used to convey letters.[xix] In images, meanings are created by the layout and spatial positions of these elements.[19] The entities that constitute an image are socially, politically, and culturally constructed. The aforementioned epitome may represent different rhetorical meanings depending on the audition. The choice and arrangement of the elements in an image should be used to accomplish the desired rhetorical effects and convey messages accurately to specific audiences, societies, and cultures.[19]

The apply of images is a conscious, communicative decision as the colors, form, medium, and size are each chosen on purpose.[10] However, a person may come in contact with a sign, but if they have no relation to the sign, its message is capricious. Therefore, in gild for artifacts or products to exist conceptualized as visual rhetoric, they must be symbolic, involve man intervention, and be presented to an audience for the purpose of communicating.[10]

In "The Rhetoric of the Prototype", Roland Barthes examines the semiotic nature of images, and the means that images role to communicate specific letters. Barthes points out that messages transmitted by visual images include coded iconic and non-coded iconic linguistic letters.[twenty] Visual rhetorical images tin be categorized into two dimensions: significant operation and visual structure.[21] Meaning operation refers to the relations and connections between elements in visual images. Visual structure refers to the way that the elements are visually displayed.[21]

Assay terminology [edit]

Rhetorical critics take borrowed assay terminology from C.S. Peirce to reach direct analysis of visual messages. Icon (or iconic signs), index (or indexical signs), and symbol (or symbolic signs) are three basic categories of recognizable characteristics of visual messages.[22] Icons, or iconic signs, are recognized based on resemblance to known elements or items (e.g., one's ID photograph on a company badge). Indexes, or indexical signs, are recognized based on understanding of a visual trace, imprint, or element that signals prior activity, or process, the agent of which is no longer visible (eastward.grand., tire tracks in the sand). Symbols, or symbolic signs, are recognized only on the basis of a shared, learned code of visual signs (due east.g., a Mercedes Benz logo, or whatsoever printed word in any written language). These three types of visual signs individually, or in combination, make upward the visual pattern elements of nigh all visual messages.

Modern application [edit]

Visual images have always played a role in advice, yet the recent advancements in applied science have enabled users to produce and share images on a mass scale.[23] The mass communication of images has fabricated spread of news and information a much quicker process. As a result, certain images may become "viral", meaning the image may have been shared and seen past a big number of audiences, and attracted mainstream media attending.[24] Images are utilized in a multifariousness of ways for a number of purposes. From business organisation to fine art to entertainment, the versatility of images in pop civilization take some scholars arguing words will somewhen go outdated.[23]

How to Rhetorically Clarify an Prototype [edit]

  • Determine the audition; who the intended readership/viewer of the text.
  • Determine the purpose; the importance of the bulletin backside the image.
  • Make up one's mind the context and meaning(due south) behind the image/text.[25]

How to Rhetorically Clarify the Design Choices of an Image:

  • Accent: search for the stress of the image; where does the author/creative person want the audience attention to get to?
  • Contrast: search for the element that stands out in the paradigm; where is the emphasis in the image?
  • Color: helps the audience figure out the emphasis of an image. Why were sure colors used in this prototype? What exercise the option of these colors tell us?
  • Organization: the arrangement of elements that make the image a whole. How is the prototype organized? What does the organization of the paradigm tell the audience?
  • Alignment: the line up of the paradigm. How does the alignment of the paradigm control how the audiences' eyes view the epitome?
  • Proximity: the space used (or not used) in an image. How close (or not so shut) are the elements portrayed in the paradigm? What meaning does that make?[25]

Visual advice pattern [edit]

Method of entreatment [edit]

Aristotle proposed 3 types of appeal to an audition:

  • Ethos is the appeal to ideals or integrity.
  • Pathos is the appeal to emotions
  • Logos is the appeal to logic or reason[26]

These techniques are a technical skill learned and utilized past visual communication designer's today, such as in the field of advertising. Each of these methods of entreatment take the ability to influence their audience in different ways. Methods of appeal can likewise be combined to strengthen the underlying message.

Visual literacy [edit]

Visual literacy is the ability to read, clarify, and evoke significant from visual text through the means of visual grammer. Visual Communication Designers depend on their audition having visual literacy to comprehend their outputted materials.[27]

Visual Ethics [edit]

Research has shown that in that location are ethical implications to the presentation of visuals.[28] [29] [30] "Visuals present the risk of, all too easily, swaying their audiences in an unethical fashion."[31] Advances in technology have fabricated information technology easier to dispense and distort visuals.[30] Visual communicators are expected to accurately portray data and avert misleading or deceiving viewers.[32]

Advertisements [edit]

Advertisers know that their consumers are able to associate one affair to some other; therefore, when an ad shows two things that seemingly different, they know that the consumer volition observe a connection between the 2.[33] Advertisers as well discover ways to make sure that the consumer creates a positive association betwixt what they are selling and whatever they are associating their production with.[33]

In advertising, at that place are 9 main classifications for how ads incorporate visual rhetoric.[33] These classifications vary in complexity with the least complex being when advertisers juxtapose their production with some other prototype (listed equally one,two,3).[33] Later juxtaposition, the complication is increased with fusion, which is when an advertiser's product is combined with another prototype (listed as 4,5,6).[33] The most complex is replacement, which replaces the product with another production (listed as vii,viii,9). Each of these sections as well include a variety of richness.[33] The least rich would exist connectedness, which shows how 1 product is associated with some other product (listed as 1,iv,7).[33] The side by side rich would be similarity, which shows how a product is like another product or image (listed as two,5,8,).[33] Finally, the virtually rich would exist opposition, which is when advertisers show how their product is not like another production or image (listed as 3,six,9).[33]

  1. Advertisers tin put their product next to another image in order to have the consumer associate their product with the presented image.
  2. Advertisers can put their product next to some other image to show the similarity between their product and the presented image.
  3. Advertisers can put their production next to another epitome in order to evidence the consumer that their production is nothing like what the image shows.
  4. Advertisers tin combine their product with an prototype in order to have the consumer acquaintance their production with the presented epitome.
  5. Advertisers can combine their product with an paradigm to testify the similarity between their product and the presented image.
  6. Advertisers tin combine their product with another paradigm in order to bear witness the consumer that their product is nothing like what the epitome shows.
  7. Advertisers can supersede their product with an paradigm to accept the consumer associate their product with the presented image.
  8. Advertisers tin supervene upon their product with an epitome to evidence the similarity betwixt their product and the presented prototype.
  9. Advertisers can replace their product with some other paradigm to testify the consumer that their production is nothing similar what the image shows.

Each of these categories varies in complexity, where putting a product adjacent to a chosen image is the simplest and replacing the product entirely is the almost circuitous.[33] The reason why putting a production next to a chosen epitome is the about uncomplicated is considering the consumer has already been shown that there is a connection between the two.[33] In other words, the consumer merely has to effigy out why there is the connectedness. Withal, when advertisers replace the product that they are selling with another epitome, and then the consumer must kickoff figure out the connection and figure out why the connectedness was made.

Visual arts [edit]

Visual tropes and tropic thinking are a office of visual rhetoric. While the field of visual rhetoric isn't necessarily concerned with the aesthetic choices of a slice, the same principles of visual composition may be applied to the study and practice of visual art. For case, figures of speech, such as personification or allusion, may be implemented in the creation of an artwork. A painting may allude to peace with an olive branch or to Christianity with a cross; in the aforementioned fashion, an artwork may employ personification past attributing human qualities to a non-human being entity. In general, even so, visual art is a split field of study than visual rhetoric.[ citation needed ]

This image portrays a young person property a heart. Instead of looking at this image literally, rhetoricians volition discover the keyhole in the heart'south eye and retrieve critically most this image'south significance.

Graffiti [edit]

Graffiti is a "pictorial or visual inscription on a publically [sic] accessible surface."[34] According to Hanauer, Graffiti achieves 3 functions; the first is to allow marginalized texts to participate in the public discourse, the 2nd is that graffiti serves the purpose of expressing openly "controversial contents", and the third is to let "marginal groups to the possibility of expressing themselves publicly."[35] Bates and Martin note that this course of rhetoric has been around even in ancient Pompeii; with an example from 79 A.D. reading, "Oh wall, then many men have come here to scrawl, I wonder that your burdened sides don't autumn".[36] Gross and Gross indicated that graffiti is capable of serving a rhetorical purpose.[37] Inside a more modern context, Wiens' (2014) enquiry showed that graffiti tin be considered an alternative way of creating rhetorical meaning for issues such every bit homelessness.[38] Furthermore, according to Ley and Cybriwsky graffiti tin can be an expression of territory, especially inside the context of gangs.[39] This form of Visual Rhetoric is meant to communicate meaning to anyone who so happens to see information technology, and due to its long history and prevalence, several styles and techniques accept emerged to capture the attending of an audience.

Visual rhetoric of text [edit]

While visual rhetoric is usually practical to denote the non-textual artifacts, the utilise and presentation of words is still critical to understanding the visual argument as a whole. Across how a message is conveyed, the presentation of that message encompasses the study and do of typography. Professionals in fields from graphic design to volume publishing make deliberate choices nigh how a typeface looks, including but non limited to concerns of functionality, emotional evocations, and cultural context.[40]

An case of a simple meme. Identifiable symbols make full gaps in meaning where text is absent.

Memes [edit]

Though a relatively new way of using images, visual Internet memes are ane of the more pervasive forms of visual rhetoric. Visual memes represent a genre of visual communication that often combines images and text to create significant. Visual memes can be understood through visual rhetoric, which "combines elements of the semiotic and discursive approaches to analyze the persuasive elements of visual texts."[41] Furthermore, memes fit into this rhetorical category considering of their persuasive nature and their ability "to depict viewers into the argument's construction via the viewer'southward cerebral office in completing "visual enthymemes" to fill in the unstated premise."[42] The visual portion of the meme is a part of its multimodal grammar, allowing a person to decode the text through "cultural codes" that contextualize the prototype to construct pregnant.[43] Considering of what is unstated, memetic images can concur multiple interpretations.[44] Equally groups create and share a specific meme template what is unstated becomes a fixed reading with "novel expression."[43]

Shifman, in an analysis of KnowYourMeme.com, found that popular memetic images often characteristic juxtaposition and frozen motility.[45] Juxtaposition frames clashing visual elements in order to "deepen the ridicule" with a large incongruity or diminishes the original contrast by taking the visual object into a more fitting state of affairs.[45] Frozen move pictures an action made static, leaving the viewer to complete the movement in order to complete the premise.[45]

Considered by some scholars to be a subversive form of communication, memetic images accept been used to unify political movements, such as umbrellas during the Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong or the images of tea numberless by the Tea Political party Motion in 2009.[46]

According to a 2013 written report by Bauckhage, et al., the temporal nature of nearly memes and their "hype cycles" of popularity are in line with the behavior of a typical fad and suggest that afterwards they proliferate and become mainstream, memes quickly lose their appeal and popularity.[47] Once it has lost its entreatment, a meme is pronounced "dead" to signify its overuse or mainstream appearance.[43]

Amidst the intrinsic factors of memes that bear on their potential rise to popularity is similarity. A 2014 report conducted by researcher Michele Coscia concluded that meme similarity has a negative correlation to meme popularity, and can therefore be used, forth with factors similar social network structure, to explain the popularity of various memes.[48] A 2015 study past Mazambani et al. concluded that other factors of influence in meme spread inside an online community include how relevant a meme is to the "topic focus" or theme of the online community as well as whether the posting user is in a position of power inside an online setting.[49] Memes that are consequent with a grouping's theme and memes that originate from lower-status members inside the group spread faster than memes that are inconsistent and are created by members of a group that are in positions of power.[49]

Scholars like Jakub Nowak propose the idea of popular driven media as well. Successful memes originate and proliferate by means of anonymous internet users, non entities like corporations or political parties that take an agenda. For this reason, anonymity is linked to meme popularity and credibility. Nowak asserts that meme authorship should remain bearding, considering this is the but way to permit people make the statements that they want to freely.[fifty]

See also [edit]

  • Media influence
  • Media theory of limerick
  • Rhetoric
  • Digital rhetoric
  • Visual advice
  • Visual culture
  • Visual literacy
  • Visualization (graphics)

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b Danesi, Marcel (2017). "Visual Rhetoric and Semiotic". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.43. ISBN978-0-19-022861-three.
  2. ^ a b Hocks, Mary E. (2003). "Agreement Visual Rhetoric in Digital Writing Environments". College Composition and Communication. 54 (4): 629–656. doi:ten.2307/3594188. JSTOR 3594188. ProQuest 220689156.
  3. ^ Lab, Purdue Writing. "Visual Rhetoric Slide Presentation // Purdue Writing Lab". Purdue Writing Lab . Retrieved 2020-05-02 .
  4. ^ a b Gatta, Oriana (Fall 2013). "English 3135: Visual Rhetoric". Composition Studies. 41 (two): 78–86, 139. ProQuest 1509802231.
  5. ^ Lab, Purdue Writing. "Analyzing Visual Documents // Purdue Writing Lab". Purdue Writing Lab . Retrieved 2020-05-03 .
  6. ^ "Visual Rhetoric: Overview". Purdue Online Writing Lab. Retrieved 2013-ten-21 .
  7. ^ Mortensen, Mette; Allan, Stuart; Peters, Chris (1 November 2017). "The Iconic Paradigm in a Digital Age: Editorial Mediations over the Alan Kurdi Photographs". Nordicom Review. 38 (s2): 71–86. doi:10.1515/nor-2017-0415. S2CID 28840942. Gale A625243398 ProQuest 2344530532.
  8. ^ a b Kress, Gunther; Selander, Staffan (October 2012). "Multimodal design, learning and cultures of recognition". The Net and Higher Education. 15 (4): 265–268. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.003.
  9. ^ a b Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge, 1996.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l thou n Foss, Sonja K (2004). "Framing the Study of Visual Rhetoric: Toward a Transformation of Rhetorical Theory" (PDF). In Hill, Charles A.; Helmers, Marguerite (eds.). Defining Visual Rhetorics. Taylor & Francis. pp. 303–313. doi:10.4324/9781410609977-19. ISBN978-1-4106-0997-7.
  11. ^ The Rhetorical tradition : readings from classical times to the nowadays. Bizzell, Patricia., Herzberg, Bruce. Boston: Bedford Books of St. Martin's Press. 1990. pp. 22. ISBN9780312003487. OCLC 21325600. {{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  12. ^ "Mere Rhetoric: Lord Kames".
  13. ^ a b Roland., Barthes (1977). Paradigm, music, text. Heath, Stephen. New York: Hill and Wang. ISBN978-0374521363. OCLC 3414738.
  14. ^ a b Ly-Le, Tuong-Minh (August 9, 2014). "Allure and Persuasion in Advertising - A Beginner'southward Guide to Visual Rhetoric". LinkedIn. Archived from the original on 2018-05-24.
  15. ^ a b Hill, Charles, and Marguerite Helmers, eds. Defining Visual Rhetorics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 2004.
  16. ^ a b Hill, Charles. "Reading the Visual in College Writing Classes." Intertexts: Reading Pedagogy in College Writing Classrooms. Ed. Marguerite Helmers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
  17. ^ a b George, Diana (2002). "From Analysis to Design: Visual Communication in the Didactics of Writing". College Composition and Communication. 54 (1): xi–39. doi:10.2307/1512100. JSTOR 1512100. ProQuest 220688073.
  18. ^ a b Ehses, Hanno. "Rhetorical Handsbook." 1988.
  19. ^ a b c Kress, Gunther (2010). Multimodality--a Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Advice. New York: Routledge. ISBN9780415320610. [ page needed ]
  20. ^ Borchers, Timothy (2011). Rhetorical Theory--An Introduction. Long Grove ILL: Waveland Press. pp. 271–272. ISBN978-1577667315.
  21. ^ a b Phillips, Barbara J.; McQuarrie, Edward F. (June 2004). "Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising". Marketing Theory. four (ane–ii): 113–136. doi:ten.1177/1470593104044089. S2CID 73621526.
  22. ^ Lester, Paul Martin (2013-02-14). Visual Communication: Images with Messages. Cengage Learning. ISBN9781133308645.
  23. ^ a b McComiskey, Bruce (1 Jan 2014). "Visual Rhetoric and the New Public Discourse". JAC: A Periodical of Rhetoric, Culture, & Politics. 24: 187–206.
  24. ^ "What Does 'Going Viral Online' Actually Mean?". Lifewire . Retrieved 2018-03-10 .
  25. ^ a b Ball, Cheryl E., author. (16 March 2018). Writer/designer : a guide to making multimodal projects. ISBN978-one-319-05856-2. OCLC 1021051218. CS1 maint: multiple names: authors listing (link)
  26. ^ Botha, Anneli (xix September 2012). An exploration of the conceptual relationship between design aesthetics and Aristotelian rhetoric in information visualisation (Thesis). hdl:2263/27944.
  27. ^ Fox, Randy (Jan 9, 2013). "Visual Rhetoric: An Introduction for Students of Visual Communication". AIGA - Colorada . Retrieved March 31, 2019.
  28. ^ Kienzler, D. S. (i April 1997). "Visual Ideals". Journal of Business Communication. 34 (2): 171–187. doi:x.1177/002194369703400204. S2CID 220880176.
  29. ^ Wiles, Rose; Prosser, Jon; Bagnoli, Anna; Clark, Andrew; Davies, Katherine; Holland, Sally; Renold, Emma (October 2008). "Visual Ethics: Ethical Issues in Visual Enquiry".
  30. ^ a b Allen, Nancy (January 1996). "Ethics and Visual Rhetorics: Seeing'southward Not Believing Anymore". Technical Communication Quarterly. 5 (1): 87–105. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq0501_6.
  31. ^ McDonnell, Amber (2020). "The Ethics of Visual Rhetoric & Photo Manipulation". XChanges.
  32. ^ Dragga, Sam; Voss, Dan (1 February 2003). "Hiding Humanity: Exact and Visual Ethics in Accident Reports". Technical Communication. 50 (i): 61–82. hdl:10822/1002710. Gale A98055409 ProQuest 220997816.
  33. ^ a b c d e f 1000 h i j k Phillips, Barbara; McQuarrie, Edward (2004). "Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising" (PDF). Marketing Theory. 4 (1–2): 113–136. doi:10.1177/1470593104044089. S2CID 73621526.
  34. ^ Hanauer, David (2011). "The discursive structure of the separation wall at Abu Dis: Graffiti as political discourse". Journal of Language and Politics. 10 (3): 301–321. doi:10.1075/jlp.10.iii.01han.
  35. ^ Hanauer, David (2004). "Silence, voice and erasure: psychological embodiment in graffiti at the site of Prime Minister Rabin's assassination". The Arts in Psychotherapy. 31: 29–35. doi:10.1016/j.aip.2004.01.001.
  36. ^ Bates, John (1980). "The thematic content of graffiti every bit a nonreactive indicator of male and female person attitudes". The Journal of Sexual practice Inquiry. 16 (four): 300–315. doi:10.1080/00224498009551087.
  37. ^ Gross, Daniel D.; Gross, Timothy D. (22 September 1993). "Tagging: irresolute visual patterns and the rhetorical implications of a new course of graffiti". Etc. fifty (3): 250–265. Gale A14540573 ProQuest 1290169516.
  38. ^ Wiens, Brianna Ivy. Home Is Where the Spray-Painted Heart Is: Graffiti equally Rhetorical Resistance on Skid Row (Thesis).
  39. ^ Ley, David; Cybriwsky, Roman (December 1974). "Urban Graffiti as Territorial Markers". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 64 (iv): 491–505. doi:x.1111/j.1467-8306.1974.tb00998.ten. S2CID 41530734.
  40. ^ Michael Bierut, "At present You Run into Information technology and Other Essays on Design." Princeton Architectural Press. New York. November 7, 2017.
  41. ^ Huntington, Heidi (2013). "Subversive Memes: Cyberspace Memes as a Grade of Visual Rhetoric". Selected Papers of Cyberspace Research. fourteen.
  42. ^ Blair, J. A. (2004). The rhetoric of visual arguments. In C. A. Hill & Thousand. Helmers (Eds.) Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 41-61). Mahwah, Northward.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assembly.
  43. ^ a b c Milner, Ryan (2016). The Earth Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. MIT Press. ISBN9780262034999.
  44. ^ Hahner, Leslie (2 February 2017). "The Riot Kiss: Framing Memes as Visual Argument". Argumentation and Advancement. 49 (3): 151–166. doi:10.1080/00028533.2013.11821790. S2CID 140824851 – via Taylor & Francis.
  45. ^ a b c Shifman, Limor (2014). Memes in Digital Culture. MIT Press. p. 89. ISBN978-0-262-31769-vi.
  46. ^ Mina, An Xiao (2019). Memes to Movements: How the World's Virtually Popular Medea is Changing Social Protest and Ability. Beacon Press. ISBN9780807056585.
  47. ^ Bauckhage, Christian; Kersting, Kristian; Hadiji, Fabian (28 June 2013). "Mathematical Models of Fads Explicate the Temporal Dynamics of Net Memes". Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Spider web and Social Media. 7 (1).
  48. ^ Coscia, Michele (May 2015). "Average is Boring: How Similarity Kills a Meme's Success". Scientific Reports. 4 (1): 6477. Bibcode:2014NatSR...4E6477C. doi:10.1038/srep06477. PMC4175728. PMID 25257730.
  49. ^ a b Mazambani, Gideon; Carlson, Maria A.; Reysen, Stephen; Hempelmann, Christian F. (30 November 2015). "Impact of Status and Meme Content on the Spread of Memes in Virtual Communities". Human Engineering. xi (two): 148–164. doi:x.17011/ht/urn.201511113638.
  50. ^ Nowak, Jakub (xi May 2016). "Internet meme as meaningful discourse: Towards a theory of multiparticipant popular online content". Central European Journal of Communication. 9 (1): 73–89. doi:10.19195/1899-5101.9.1(16).v.
  51. ^ Barthes, Roland. "The Rhetoric of the Image." Image, Music, Text. Ed. and trans. Stephen Heath. New York: Colina and Wang, 1977. 32-51.
  52. ^ Groupe μ. Traité du signe visuel. Pour une rhétorique de fifty'image. Paris: Le Seuil, 1992.
  53. ^ Handa, Carolyn, ed. Visual Rhetoric in a Digital World. New York: Bedford/St. Martin'south, 2004.
  54. ^ Kostelnick, Charles, and David D. Roberts, Designing Visual Linguistic communication: Strategies for Professional Communicators. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998.
  55. ^ Rose, Gillian. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London: SAGE Publications, 2007.
  56. ^ Willerton, Russell (Jan 2005). "Visual Metonymy and Synecdoche: Rhetoric for Stage-Setting Images". Periodical of Technical Writing and Communication. 35 (i): iii–31. doi:10.2190/P22X-GKA9-7FGT-MT2X. S2CID 143188542.
  57. ^ Stornier, Nathan (May 1997). "Embodying normal miracles". Quarterly Journal of Spoken communication. 83 (ii): 172–191. doi:x.1080/00335639709384179.
  58. ^ The Miracle of Life. Dir. Lennart Nilson. Time-Life Video. 1983

External links [edit]

  • Visual Rhetoric in Social Campaigns
  • viz.: Rhetoric, Visual Culture, Education
  • Semiotics for Beginners
  • Pictorial Semiotics

cababehe1951.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_rhetoric

0 Response to "The Art of Voice Language Art of the Rhetoric"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel